![]() ![]() ![]() hope that it doesn’t happen.Īs for the rest, the maneuverability is good, nothing groundbreaking but the ship handles nicely. If you are lucky, they will just overpenetrate, if not, well…. The armor, of course, remains the one of a light cruiser so keep an eye on the big bad battleship shells going towards you. the grouping sure will be better but that’s not a sudden jump that will make the Cleveland guns look like shotguns. As for the increased sigma, it’s more a placebo change than anything. The ship’s firepower is of course very good with the HE and fast reload. As I said at the beginning, it is basically a Cleveland with some small modifications and the Cleveland is from the start a very satisfying ship to play in my opinion. I will be direct, I enjoyed the Montpelier. A lose of reload time for a forgettable gain of accuracy.Both defensive AA and hydroacoustic search.The conditions of testingĭuring the testing of the Montpelier, I used the following captain build and upgrades: If I had to summarize Montpelier in a single sentence, it would be the following: “It is a Cleveland.” That’s literally a Cleveland with 7 s reload instead of 6.5 s but a better sigma of 2.15 instead of 2.05 and finally 600 more HP. Now that this is clear, Ladies and Gentlemen, let’s take about these 3 premiums and what I think of them after the few games I played with them. ![]() When you will see it in an article, it means that the ship that I am covering might change at some point before her official release. This, my friends, is the “Work in progress” warning. Before we start this article, let me introduce you to a very important signal. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |